No but really, Catch-22 is definitely one of my favourites, and I'm very glad I finally read it. It's about Yossarian, a captain during World War II. This book is actually the origin of the term catch-22. Here is one of the instances of this wonderfully-dissonant logic in the novel:
There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he were sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.The novel is very funny, and the non-linear timeline is interesting. It was an extremely entertaining experience—one of those great books that makes you sad after you finish reading it because it's over. In fact, finishing the book was so disappointing that I went back to re-read the best parts (the chapters in Rome are very good). And if that isn't the mark of an excellent novel, then what is?
Catch-22 on Wikipedia
Catch-22 on Amazon (this is an affiliate link; buying it using this link will cost nothing extra for you, but it will allow me to buy more books to review!)
Here is the non-affiliate link. It's the same price, so please consider using my above link!
